Last updateSat, 17 Feb 2018 3pm

Back You are here: Home Library Islam Religious Pluralism Belief in God and the Hereafter

Belief in God and the Hereafter

Belief in God and the Hereafter

 The relation of this world to the hereafter is similar to the relation between the body and the spirit, or the relation of the outer aspect to the inner aspect.  This world and the next are not two wholly and entirely separate worlds; this world and the hereafter together are one unit, just as a sheet of paper has two pages and a coin has two sides.  This same Earth that exists in this world will appear in the hereafter in its otherworldly form.  The plants and objects of this world will appear in the hereafter in their otherworldly aspect.  Fundamentally, the hereafter is the celestial, or malakÅ«t, form of the present world.

 The condition for an action to acquire a good otherworldly aspect is for it to be performed with attention to God and in order to ascend to God’s higher realm.  If a person doesn’t believe in the hereafter and isn’t attentive to God, his or her action will not have an otherworldly aspect, and thus will not ascend to the higher realm.  The otherworldly aspect is the higher aspect, and the worldly aspect is the lower aspect.  As long as an action does not acquire illumination and purity through intention, belief, and faith, it cannot attain to the highest realm; only an action that has a spirit can attain that station.  And the spirit of an action is its otherworldly aspect.

How beautiful are the words of the Qur’ān:

  Ø¥ÙÙ„َيْـهِ يَصْعَدُ الْكَلِمُ الطَّيِّبُ ÙˆÙŽ الْعَمَلُ الصٌّلِحُ يَرْفَعَهُ

 “To Him rises the pure word, and good deeds He raises.”[59]

 This verse can be understood in two ways, and both have been mentioned in books of exegesis of the Qur’ān.  The first is that good deeds raise pure words and pure belief; the other is that pure words and pure belief raise good deeds and make them otherworldly.  The two explanations – both of which are correct and possibly both are intended – together convey the principle that faith has an effect on the acceptance of actions and their ascent to God, and actions have an effect on the perfection of faith and on increasing the degree of faith.  This principle is an accepted one in the Islāmic teachings.  Our reference to this verse is based on the second explanation, though as we indicated, in our view it is possible that the verse has intended both meanings at the same time.

 In any case, it is a mistake for us to think that the actions of those who don’t believe in God and the Day of Judgement ascend to God and acquire an otherworldly aspect.

 If we are told that someone has taken the northbound highway from Tehran and continued to travel northward for several days, we will obviously not expect that person to reach Qum, Iŝfahān, or ShÄ«rāz (which lie south of Tehran); if someone were to entertain such a possibility, we would laugh and tell him that if that person wished to go to one of those cities, he or she would have to take the southbound highway from Tehran and travel on it.

 It is impossible for someone to travel towards Turkistān, yet reach the Ka`bah.

 Heaven and Hell are the two ends of a person’s spiritual journey.  In the next world, every person sees him or herself at his or her journey’s final point; one above, and the other below; one the highest of the high, and the other the lowest of the low.

  Ø¥ÙÙ†Ù‘ÙŽ كِتٌبَ الأَبْرٌارَ لَفِـي عِلِّيِّـينَ

 “The record of the pious is indeed in IlliyÄ«n.”[60]

  Ø¥ÙÙ†Ù‘ÙŽ كِتٌبَ الْفُجٌّارَ لَفِـي سِجِّينَ

 “The record of the vicious is indeed in SijjÄ«n.”[61]

 How is it possible for a person not to travel towards a certain destination, or to travel in a direction opposite to it, yet still reach that destination?  Moving towards the highest heaven (`IlliyyÄ«n) requires an intention and desire to reach it, and that in turn requires recognition and belief on the one hand, and facilitation and submission on the other.  If a person has no belief in such a destination, or lacks the quality of facilitation and submission, and in short has neither any desire nor takes even the smallest step to reach it, how can one expect him or her to attain that destination?  Without doubt, every path leads to its own destination, and unless God is that destination, the path does not lead to God.

The Qur’ān says:

 Ù…َنْ كٌانَ يُرِيدُ الْعٌاجِلَةَ عَجَّلْنٌا لَهُ فِيهٌا مٌا نَشٌاءُ لِمَنْ نُّرِيدُ ثُمَّ جَعَلْنٌا لَهُ جَهَنَّمَ يَصْلاٌهٌا مَذْمُومًا مَّدْحُورًا وَمَنْ أَرٌادَ الآخِرَةَ وَسَعَى لَهٌا سَعْيَهٌا وَهُوَ مُؤْمِنٌ فَأُولٌئِكَ كٌانَ سَعْيُهُم مَّشْكُورًا

 “Whoever desires this transitory life, We expedite for him therein whatever We wish, for whomever We desire.  Then We appoint hell for him, to enter it, blameful and spurned.  Whoever desires the Hereafter and strives for it with an endeavour worthy of it, should he be faithful—the endeavour of such will be well-appreciated.”[62]

 That is, if a person’s level of thinking is no higher than this world and he or she has no goal higher than this world, it is impossible for that person to attain the high target of the hereafter; but Our Divine grace and benevolence demand that We grant him or her something of the worldly goal he or she desired to achieve.

 There is a subtle point here: this world is the world of nature and matter; it is the world of causes and reasons.  Worldly causes are in conflict with each other, and constraints also exist in this material world.  Thus, for a person whose goal is this world, there is no guarantee that he or she will definitely attain that goal.  The words the Qur’ān has chosen to impart this point are as follows:

 “We expedite for him therein whatever We wish, for whomever We desire.”

 However, one who has a higher goal in his or her spiritual makeup has not given his or her heart to trifling goals, and who, moving forward with faith, takes steps towards a Divine object will certainly attain the goal, since God recognizes the value of good deeds; He accepts and rewards those good deeds that are presented to Him.

 Here, effort and endeavour are necessary, since it is impossible for a person to move forward and attain the goal without taking a step.

Then in the next verse, the Qur’ān says:

  ÙƒÙÙ„اًّ نُّمِدُّ هَـؤُلاٌءِ وَهَـؤُلاٌءِ مِنْ عَطٌاءِ رَبِّكَ وَمٌا كٌانَ عَطٌاءُ رَبِّكَ مَحْظُورًا

 “Each We assist out of the bounty of your Lord, both this group and that one; and the bounty of your Lord has not been withheld from any.”[63]

 That is, Our bounty is limitless; whoever sows a seed, We bring it to fruition; whoever moves towards a goal, We deliver him or her to that goal.

 The Divine sages say that the Being who is necessarily existent by essence is necessarily existent from all aspects and dimensions.  Thus, He is necessarily Bountiful (Fayyādh).  As a result, whoever wishes something, God assists him or her.  It is not the case that if someone seeks the world, God says to him or her, “You are misguided and have acted contrary to Our guidance and direction, so We will not assist you.” That is not the case; the seeker of the world is also supported and assisted by God in seeking this world and benefits from His unhesitant bounty within the limits permitted by this world of causes, mutual exclusivity, and conflicting outcomes.

 In other words, this world is a place appropriate for and given to planting, growing, increasing, and harvesting.  It all depends on what seed a person chooses to grow and develop and what harvest he or she wishes to reap.  Whatever seed he or she chooses is exactly what will grow and develop in the rich and fertile land of this world.

 True, there is an exclusive assistance particular to the people of Truth, which is called the rahÄ«miyyah (exclusive) mercy; the seekers of this world are deprived of this mercy, since they do not seek it.  But the rahmāniyyah (general) mercy of God applies equally to all people and all paths.  In the words of Sa`dÄ«:

 Ø§Ø¯ÙŠÙ… زمين سفره عام اوست
 Ø¨Ø± اين خوان يغما Ú†Ù‡ دشمن Ú†Ù‡ دوست

 The earth’s surface is His all-encompassing table,

From this table all partake, whether friend or foe.

 From what has been said in this discussion, a portion of the issues under examination have been resolved.

 We made clear that action-related goodness is not sufficient for reward in the hereafter; actor-related goodness is also necessary.  Action-related goodness is similar to a body, and actor-related goodness is similar to its spirit and life.  And we explained that belief in God and the Day of Judgement is a fundamental condition of actor-related goodness.  This conditionality is not based on convention, but is instead an essential and actual conditionality, just like the conditionality of a particular path with respect to reaching a particular destination.

 Here, it is necessary to clarify one point, which is that some will perhaps say that actor-related goodness does not necessarily require the intention of seeking nearness to God; if a person does a good deed because of one’s conscience or out of a feeling of compassion or mercy, that is sufficient for his or her action to possess actor-related goodness.  In other words, a humanitarian motive is sufficient for actor-related goodness; as long as a person’s motive is other than the “self”, actor-related goodness is present, whether the motive be “God” or “humanism.”

 This point is worthy of consideration.  While we don’t affirm the view that it makes no difference whether one’s motive be God or humanism, and we can’t enter this discussion in depth right now, we do truly believe that whenever an action is performed with the motive of doing good, serving others, and for the sake of humanity, it is not the same as an action that is performed solely with selfish motives.  Without doubt, God will not leave such people without any reward.  Several traditions indicate that on account of their good deeds, polytheists like Ĥātam al-Ťā`Ä«Ä« will not be punished or the punishment of such people will be reduced, even though they were polytheists.

We can understand this point from many traditions which we have before us.

 1.  `Allāmah MajlisÄ«quotes from the book Thawābul A`māl of Shaykh ÅœadÅ«q  that `AlÄ« Ibn YaqtÄ«n  narrated from Imām MÅ«sā Ibn Ja`far al-Kādhim (as) that he said, “Amongst the BanÄ« Isrā’Ä«l (Children of Isrā’il) there was a believer whose neighbour was an unbeliever.  That unbeliever would always show kindness and good conduct towards his believing neighbour.  When this unbeliever died, God made for him a house out of a type of mud which shielded him from the heat of the fire, and his sustenance would be given to him from outside his own environment, which was of fire.  He was told, ‘This is because of your kindness and good conduct towards your believing neighbour.’”[64]

Allāmah MajlisÄ« , after quoting this tradition, says: “This tradition and others like it are evidence that the punishment of some unbelievers in Hell will be lifted, and the verses of Qur’ān that say the punishment of the unbelievers shall not be lightened are with regard to those who have not performed such good deeds.”

 2.  He also narrates from Imām Muhammad Ibn `AlÄ« al-Bāqir (as) that he said, “There was a believer who lived in the land of an oppressive king.  That oppressor threatened the believer, and thus, the believer fled to a non-Islāmic land, arriving at the place of a polytheist man.  The polytheist sat him beside himself and hosted him well.  As soon as the polytheist man died, God addressed him, ‘I swear by My Honour and Glory that if there were a place in Heaven for a polytheist, I would put you in that place; but O’ fire, make him fear, but don’t harm him.’”

 Then the Imām said, “Every morning and evening his sustenance is brought for him from outside that environment.” The Imām was asked, “From Heaven?” He answered, “From where God wills.”[65]

 3.  The Noble Messenger (S) said about `Abdullāh Ibn Jud`ān who was one of the well-known unbelievers in the Age of Ignorance and one of the chiefs of Quraysh, “The one who has the lightest punishment in Hell is Ibn Jud`ān.” He was asked why, to which he replied:

إِنَّهُ كٌانَ يُطْعِمُ الطَّعٌامَ

“He used to give people to eat.”

 4.  In addition, the Prophet Muhammad (S) said with regard to several people who lived in the Age of Ignorance: “I saw in Hell the possessor of the tunic and the possessor of the cane who would drive the pilgrims, and also the woman who had a cat which she had tied up and which she would neither feed nor set free so it could find its own food.  And I entered Heaven and I saw there the man who saved a dog from thirst and gave it water.”[66]

 Such people, who are found in more or less every age, will at least have their punishment lightened or their punishment lifted altogether.

 In my view, if there are individuals who do good to other people or even to another living being – whether a human being or animal – without any expectation, not even because they see themselves mirrored in the existence of the deprived (i.e., fear that one day they may be in similar straits is not the moving factor in what they do), and instead the motive of doing good and serving others is strong enough in them that even if they know that no benefit will accrue to them and not even a single person will come to know of what they did or say so much as “God bless you” to them, yet they still do good deeds, and they are not under the influence of habit and such like, one must say that in the depths of their conscience there exists the light of recognition of God.  And supposing they deny it with their tongues, they confess it in the depths of their conscience; their denial is in reality a denial of an imagined being which they have conceived in place of God, or a denial of another imagined thing which they have conceived in place of the return to God and the Day of Judgement, not a denial of the reality of God and the Resurrection.

 Love of good and justice and doing good because it is good and just and worthy, without any other factor, is a sign of love of the Essence possessed of Absolute Beauty; therefore, it is not farfetched that such people actually will not be resurrected among the unbelievers, though by their tongues they are considered deniers.  And God knows best.

Add comment

Security code

Find us on Facebook